On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:25:01 -0700 "J. Greenlees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I decided that I wanted to take a look at init-ng while doing my current > test build with the latest svn version of the book. > once the build is done I'll be able to decide if it is worth using and > adding a hint for. > > But, in looking at it, and the dependencies, init-ng requires cmake to > build. According to the cmake site, KDE requires cmake to build. While > KDE is definately BLFS not LFS, I couldn't find where cmake is mentioned > at all in BLFS. > > init-ng, supposed to be an asynchronous initialization, that is faster > than the sysv style init currently used in the book. The docs indicate > that it can convert the sysv init scripts, and that runing it's make > after installing a new app with create the init script for the app. > [ boy, will these claims be fun to test ;) ] > > Jaqui > > runit is better. (IMnsHO) http://smarden.org/pape/ R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
