Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> AFAIK, ALFS is not an active project (9 mails to the list and 0 SVN commits
> since January, 1st). So it would be better to say something like "a scripted
> build" (meaning user-written scripts) instead of "ALFS",
Yes, that is a good idea.
> and proide some
> concrete specs of a "reasonably fast system".
Well I could use my system as an example. Under vmware running from the LiveCD:
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3 3.4G 1.3G 2.0G 41% /
/dev/sda1 99M 13M 81M 14% /boot
shm 379M 0 379M 0% /dev/shm
Memory info:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 775184 191924 583260 0 56528 11580
-/+ buffers/cache: 123816 651368
Swap: 498004 0 498004
The SBU unit value is equal to 339 seconds.
41.2 SBU total
41.2 SBUs times
339 seconds per SBU
13966.8 seconds =
232.78 minutes =
3.88 hours
It is about half that time when native and not accessing source from the CDROM.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
