On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:07:25 -0500, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Anything else? > > Ticket #2284 - radical plan would be to just drop udev-config completely, > then any reported issues should be passed upstream and fixed there. I really > don't see anything special about LFS that means it should have to customise > Udev beyond upstream's default config :-)
I think this would be nice. With recent udev, all the changes (except for Bryan's documentation) could be easily contained in a small patch. That would be doubly useful when you just want to know "how does LFS' udev differ from upstream". -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
