On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Sebastian Plotz <[email protected]> wrote: > What about changing from Sysklogd to syslog-ng? > > - syslog-ng is under active development > - sysklogd is quiet old (last version released in 2007) > - we just need to run one daemon (instead of syslogd and klogd) > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
Debian uses rsyslog Ubuntu uses rsyslog Fedora uses rsyslog openSUSE uses rsyslog RHEL uses rsyslog There are probably more, but I believe they rather universally rejected syslog-ng. (A few did switch from sysklogd to syslog-ng then to rsyslog.) Fedora has some rationale arguments against syslog-ng here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureRsyslog That said, sysklogd works just fine. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
