On 10/24/2010 11:14 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 9:59:25 -0600, Matthew Burgess > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:38:27 -0400, Drew Ames <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 1) Is it worth downloading and using the development version of Glibc >>> from git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git to build LFS with the updated >>> source? >> >> I wouldn't be keen building from the latest development version myself. >> I'm more cautious than that (especially for toolchain packages), so >> would advise to build 2.12.1 + patch for this bug. Finding such patches >> can take some time, but this one was pretty easy: >> >> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/2010-10/msg00007.html. > > That patch is now also available, in LFS format, from > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc-2.12.1-origin_fix-1.patch. > > Apply using the usual 'patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-origin_fix-1.patch'. > > Regards, > > Matt. >
Additional part. Haven't tested. http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/2010-10/msg00010.html Makes LD_AUDIT behave same as LD_PRELOAD. Will rebuild glibc in a few moments on this system see if it fixes it. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
