On 06/07/2011 09:49 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:14:59 -0500, DJ Lucas<[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 06/06/2011 03:07 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote: >>> I'd prefer for us not to use HJL's binutils >>> >> Then don't. That patch doesn't look all that invasive..no need to add >> tests for local build fix, just the 3 corrected files (bottom of the >> list). > Yep, right you are. The 1st& 2nd hunk of the elf64-x86_64.c file needed > to be fixed up, but the attached patch now applies cleanly for me. Obviously, > I can't test it myself, so if you or Andy would be so kind, I'll get it > added to the book along with the Glibc upgrade. > > Also, can you confirm that the Glibc issue mentioned by Bruce at > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2883#comment:1 hits you as well, > and we'll need to add the trivial sed to fix that too? Again, I didn't hit > this during my build. > Normally I'd jump right on it, but I don't have an available partition to test with right now, too many projects in queue right this second :-), but this weekend I should hopefully be done and be able to test in both multilib and x86_64 LFS.
-- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
