On Oct 28, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>>
>> Maybe recommend using --strip-unneeded instead since that
>> intelligently does the right thing for both types of libs.
>
> So you recommend instead:
>
> "If disk space is very tight, the --strip-unneeded option can be used on
> the binaries and libraries in /{lib,sbin,bin,usr/{bin,sbin,lib}} to gain
> several more megabytes."
>
> Is that right?
>
> That makes me a little nervous. I think I might be more in favor of
> just dropping the last paragraph. At the end of Chapter 6, a few MB
> should just not be significant. You get a lot more space by removing
> /tools as described in section 6.64, 488M in my case.
That works too.
Out of curiosity, what exactly makes you nervous?
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
