On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:47:00 +0100 Pierre Labastie <pierre.labas...@neuf.fr> wrote:
> Hi, > > I have done a test of LFS-7.1-rc1. ICA went OK, except the > already reported problem with ld.so.cache (ldconfig still missing > somewhere), which is not a big issue. In case somebody else > does ICA, there is this difference in etip.h between ICA > iterations 1 and 2: > ----------------------------------- > --- iteration-1/usr/include/etip.h 2012-02-20 10:38:14.000000000 +0100 > +++ iteration-2/usr/include/etip.h 2012-02-20 11:35:57.000000000 +0100 > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ > #endif > > #ifndef ETIP_NEEDS_MATH_H > -#define ETIP_NEEDS_MATH_H 0 > +#define ETIP_NEEDS_MATH_H 1 > #endif > > #ifndef ETIP_NEEDS_MATH_EXCEPTION > ----------------------------------- > It seems to be due to a bug in ncurses' configure: see the > thread starting at: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2012-02/msg00003.html My last message was wrong. I get the same results on i686 and x86_64. If ncurses is already installed and I don't apply your patch I get: #define ETIP_NEEDS_MATH_H 1 If ncurses is already installed and I apply your patch I get: #define ETIP_NEEDS_MATH_H 0 If ncurses is not installed you patch makes no difference, I still get: #define ETIP_NEEDS_MATH_H 0 Could it be that ETIP_NEEDS_MATH_H 0 (the current situation) is the correct result and the result you get when reinstalling ncurses is the wrong one? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
