Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 23:37 +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
>> However, being a perfectionist, I wasn't happy with
>> them hence taking so long over the upgrade. I'm after the 'correct' way
>> of dealing with this, which seems to be patching gnulib.
I will have to disagree with this one. A simple sed is a lot easier,
especially in Chapter 5 where we will be throwing it away.
I will also argue that using seds in Chapter 6 are the way to go. It
won't be long before all the problem packages will be fixed from upstream.
Also, I apologize to Andy for not reviewing his email about this. The
least I can say is that I am doing some independent verification. :)
I just ran into the test-installation.pl problem, but think I've found
a fix for that. I'll post when I get it working.
-- Bruce
P.S. The perfect is the enemy of the good.
Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien.
-- Voltaire 1764
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
