cybertao wrote these words on 03/12/13 22:24 CST: > I just realised I chose the development branch without much consideration, > when the stable version my be more appropriate. If only for the > convenience of release cycle guidelines. I focus on making a bootable CD > and USB image for now using the vanilla-SVN build and replace it with a > release build later if it's more appropriate. > i686 and x86_64 on the same image, like Arch, is a good idea isn't it?
Either one would be great, though I think a 7.3 stable ISO would be perfect. If a dual i686 and x86_64 is doable, then great, otherwise two ISOs for the two platforms shouldn't be that much harder then the combo. At least it seems that way to me. > My ambition is a terminal environment with the > tools to build LFS, SSH, screen, jhalfs, and build the book. Any bells and > whistles can be added by anyone through some sort of SquashFS or UnionFS > shenanigans (or perhaps BLFS using jhalfs). This sounds perfect. A boot ISO with SSH probably fits most folks desires to build LFS, and can be used as a rescue CD. Perfect. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 22:44:00 up 97 days, 7:43, 1 user, load average: 0.66, 0.17, 0.05 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
