On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:06 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I agree that we shouldn't go out of the way to disable unneeded portions > of builds, but I do not think we should be fixing them if they are > broken either. If they cause a problem, then disable them in Chapter 5. > The only time they need fixing is in Chapter 6.
But then we're causing ourselves more work, surely? We've got to figure out 2 'solutions'; 1 to disable the problematic component in chapter 5, and one to provide the real 'fix' in chapter 6. As we *have* to fix things in chapter 6, we may as well just reuse the fix in chapter 5 as well, no? Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
