> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:36:34 -0600 > From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > To: LFS Developers Mailinglist <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Are we ready for LFS-7.5? > > After a fairly extensive discussion, I've update the host system > requirements page in svn: > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/prologue/hostreqs.html > > I considered an erratum, but we really don't want to be put in the > position of having to bring it forward for each release. > > What I have is a compromise. I added the note under gcc and added the > final few lines in the script. I believe that the combination addresses > the slackware problem. > > If I do not hear anything that needs adjustments in the next few hours, > I will release the current svn as LFS-7.5 stable. >
In the gcc text-section: -- * s/have can be/can be/ ? * s@look in /usr/lib for @look in /usr/lib (or /usr/lib64) for @ ? * s|Either all three should be present or absent, but not only one or two.|Either all three should be present or absent, in the same directory, but not only one or two.| ? This part addresses multilib hosts, where /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 are present. -- Pierre: double-check: are you OK with the 'all three present' part? In the script part, I'd output the path, as that resolves potential ambiguity for multilib hosts. Generally, yes, reasonable+ compromise. rgds, akh > -- Bruce > -- > -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
