On 03/04/2014 04:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I've been working on udev and have got it to build with the systemd-210 > source. The problem is that it is getting more and more intertwined > with the rest of systemd requiring things that don't seem to be applicable. > > For instance, > > filea.c requires a function from > fileb.c which requires a function from > filec.c. > > The problem is that filea really doesn't require anything from filec, > but the build process doesn't like unresolved references. > > My question is whether we need to try either eudev or mdev. Does anyone > have any experience with eudev or mdev? > > I note that the latest eudev is dated today. > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~blueness/eudev/ > > -- Bruce >
eudev is rather the udev from pre-systemd merge with all the latest fixes pulled from systemd tree. Note sure, but I think mdev is something else and not really compatible with original udev. eudev seems to be the best solution for (B)LFS. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
