On 03/04/2014 04:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been working on udev and have got it to build with the systemd-210 
> source.  The problem is that it is getting more and more intertwined 
> with the rest of systemd requiring things that don't seem to be applicable.
> 
> For instance,
> 
> filea.c requires a function from
> fileb.c which requires a function from
> filec.c.
> 
> The problem is that filea really doesn't require anything from filec, 
> but the build process doesn't like unresolved references.
> 
> My question is whether we need to try either eudev or mdev.  Does anyone 
> have any experience with eudev or mdev?
> 
> I note that the latest eudev is dated today.
> 
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~blueness/eudev/
> 
>    -- Bruce
> 

eudev is rather the udev from pre-systemd merge with all the latest
fixes pulled from systemd tree.

Note sure, but I think mdev is something else and not really compatible
with original udev. eudev seems to be the best solution for (B)LFS.

-- 
Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to