On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As to /usr and /usr/local - if a distro provides binary updates, > > /usr/local may help to keep your own things unaltered. For a linux > > system, /usr/local is rarely worth the aggravation¹ - and I suspect > > that perl's vendor directory is similar. > For an LFS system > I thought it was the other way around - vendor_perl is more like /usr, and site_perl is more like /usr/local. (Of course, I'm no Perl expert, so I could easily be wrong. If site_perl takes precedence over vendor_perl, though, as somebody else indicated elsewhere in the thread, that would support my interpretation - as would the fact that cpan installs to site_perl by default just as configure installs to /usr/local by default.) -- Daniel
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
