DJ Lucas wrote:
On 05/28/2016 06:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Douglas R. Reno wrote:
Can one of you guys look at one of your test logs for e2fsprogs-1.43
please? I am getting a ton of failures here, and no idea whats causing
them yet. I would have to have a browser/mail client on my workstation
to ship the entire log, but I have seen a very small amount of tests
passing.
Yes, I get 62 tests succeeded, 265 tests failed with e2fsprogs-1.43.
That
is in a full up system.
I've sent a query to [email protected] about this. I'll report
back if I hear anything.
Upstream fix:
diff --git a/tests/filter.sed b/tests/filter.sed
index bec899c..628309d 100644
--- a/tests/filter.sed
+++ b/tests/filter.sed
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-/^debugfs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[.-][^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
-/^dumpe2fs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[.-][^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
-/^e2fsck [1-9]\.[0-9]*[.-][^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
-/^mke2fs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[.-][^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
-/^resize2fs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[.-][^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
-/^tune2fs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[.-][^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
-/^e2image [1-9]\.[0-9]*[.-][^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
+/^debugfs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
+/^dumpe2fs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
+/^e2fsck [1-9]\.[0-9]*[^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
+/^mke2fs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
+/^resize2fs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
+/^tune2fs [1-9]\.[0-9]*[^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
+/^e2image [1-9]\.[0-9]*[^ ]* ([0-9]*-[A-Za-z]*-[0-9]*)/d
s/\\015//g
/automatically checked/d
/^Directory Hash Seed:/d
Ugh, my fault. Sorry about that.
No problem. I think we can use:
sed -i -e 's:\[\.-\]::' tests/filter.sed
That's a sed to modify a script's set of seds. Say that three times
fast. :)
Tested. 327 tests succeeded 0 tests failed
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page