Am Freitag, den 09.11.2018, 11:15 +0000 schrieb John Frankish via lfs-
dev:
> > > > > Ref:
> > > > >
> > > > > Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20181029 Chapter 5. Constructing a
> > > > > Temporary System 5.5. GCC-8.2.0 - Pass 1
> > > > >
> > > > > Using the latest script to update the dynamic linker results in gcc
> > > > > failing to build.
> > > > >
> > > > > Using a previous script fixes the problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > Details below.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This script:
> > > > >
> > > > > for file in gcc/config/{linux,i386/linux{,64}}.h
> > > > > do
> > > > > cp -uv $file{,.orig}
> > > > > sed -e 's@/lib\(64\)\?\(32\)\?/ld@/tools&@g' \
> > > > > -e 's@/usr@/tools@g' $file.orig > $file
> > > > > echo '
> > > > > #undef STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_1
> > > > > #undef STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_2
> > > > > #define STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_1 "/tools/lib/"
> > > > > #define STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_2 ""' >> $file
> > > > > touch $file.orig
> > > > > done
> > > > >
> > > > This script has been in the book for a couple of years. It is hard to
> > > > believe that nobody else has seen a failure if it is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe your system is not recognized as either i386 or x86_64, or not as
> > > > linux?
> > > >
> > > > Are you building on a Mac, Unix derivate or raspberry pi? What is the
> > > > response of the " arch" command?
> > > >
> > > I'm building on a linux machine recognised as x86_64 and I
> > > tried three separate times...
> > >
> > Could it be a copy/paste artifact, such as a space after '\' at the end
> > of a line?
> > GNU_TARGET_OS_etc is defined in gcc/config/linux.h, and shouldn't
> > be modified by the said script; unless possibly if there is a typo.
> > Sorry if I sound like the error comes from your side (script, our unusual
> > system, I rule out LFS and LFS_TGT variable settings, since it seems to work
> > with the old script), but really, after 2 years, somebody should have
> > spotted
> > the same error as you.
> >
> I don't think that the new script has been in use as much as two years, since
> I last built using the LFS instructions a year ago with the old script. This
> being said, yes, you would have thought that somebody else would have noticed
> it.
Wouldn't believe that editors update instructions of those essential
tools without testing. Anyway, the scripts works, I just verified it
in this minute here again...
> It could be a copy paste error ...
or something else in the build environment. I assume you double-
checked a thousand times that all the envvars are set proper and the
host-gcc is not damaged somehow? (well shouldn't - otherwise binutils
wouldn't be compiled)
> but I tried three times with the new script and it worked first time when
> copy pasting the old script...
Which shell are you using?
--
Thomas
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
