Any objection to adding pointers to BLFS on the kernel page about Linux
firmware and cpio that might be used by make? The firmware has been a
known issue for some time but was not included in LFS because it is
covered in detail in BLFS (as well as limited to exactly what is needed
so not have a bunch of unnecessary binary blobs laying around on the
root filesystem). The cpio requirement (outside of an initrd) is
relatively new for the built-in headers. See
https://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/IKHEADERS.html for more info on that.
We pulled in OpenSSL because of this, but that's not an esoteric
requirement like above (and for most people, I think, the same for
firmware blobs - I build in for ATI cards - but maybe not as we are
seeing more of the NICs that need them now too). Personally, I just use
a local copy of the book for jhalfs and add the entire firmware repo
inline as a single install
(http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/linux-firmware.svnstash <- if
anybody needs for the same task) because I don't really care about the
blobs or disk space, and I will do the same for cpio, but I think these
should at least be mentioned in LFS, ideally IMO collapsing the two
notes on that page with these.
--DJ
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page