Le 09/02/2020 à 18:33, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev a écrit : > Le 09/02/2020 à 17:46, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev a écrit : >> On 2/9/20 10:36 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: >>> Le 09/02/2020 à 09:02, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev a écrit : >>>> I'll spare you the details of how I cam to notice this but i was just >>>> applying some local patches to the most recent trunk Rev 11745 >>>> and realised that >>>> >>>> Chapter 5 still has these two XML files in the source directory >>>> >>>> gmp.xml >>>> mpfr.xml >>>> >>> >>> Add e2fsprogs.xml and flex.xml to this list... >>> >>>> even though they are no longer rendered, nor referred to, in the Book. >>>> >>>> Similarly, in Chapter 6, these four no-longer-rendered XML files are in >>>> the source directory >>>> >>>> db.xml >>>> module-init-tools.xml >>>> pcre.xml >>>> popt.xml >>>> >>>> Maybe they could be removed from the SVN ahead of the upcoming release ? >>>> >>>> Other files that used to slumber there (ed.xml) have been given the boot. >>> >>> Also dedication.xml in prologue is not used anymore. >>> >>> Other weird things are the id attributes, where pre-xxx occurs in chapter 2, >>> ch-tools-xxx occurs in chapter 4 and chapter 6, etc. I'd suggest the >>> following: >>> -for chapters, id's are of the form chapter-xxx, where xxx may be composed >>> of >>> several words. >>> - for sect1, form the id's as follow, ch-yyy-zzz, where yyy is the last word >>> of xxx for the parent chapter, and zzz may be ad libitum, but of course >>> related to the section title... >>> - use pre-zzz for sections in the prologue >>> >>> I can make this clean up (removing unneeded files and refactor id's) if you >>> agree. >> >> Those unused files are still around because when we removed them, we were not >> sure if we wanted to put them back. I'm not sure they hurt anything, but >> what >> we can do is create an archive directory like in BLFS and move them there. >> >> I'll point out that there are probably several files in stylesheets that are >> not used, but are a part of docbook. >> >> I'm OK with you doing a cleanup if you really think we need to do that. >> > > Well, I agree it is not a big deal. It may be annoying when doing batch > modifications (something like "vi chapter05/*.xml"). Reinstating those files > would be easy, since they are present in the other chapter or in blfs, so I do > not think we need to archive them. > > Side note (off topics): the archive directory in blfs is > becoming very big, and increases the time for downloading/checking out the > book. Maybe we could have a policy of removing files older than two years or > so, since it is unlikely that those files become needed again, in their > archived form at least. > > Having id="ch-something" at the wrong place may confuse jhalfs (although this > seems to work right now, because the xsl also tests the chapter ancestor), > that's why I'd like a little id clean-up. >
Done at r11746 Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
