On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:10:03PM +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > I've done a test build with git version of glibc, and all other > packages updated. I've forgotten the beta version of autoconf.
I thought I was out on a limb with autoconf ;-) So far, apart from automake tests it looks good - but I have not (at this point) built most of the packages I identified as using it. > > The patch for gcc pass 2 is not needed anymore. > > But the sed or the whole patch for binutils gold tests is (are) > still needed. I haven't had the time to get to the exact > requirements... > Agreed. > With the git version of glibc, one more test fails, besides misc/tst- > ttyname (BTW, Ken, when this one does not fail, isn't it in the > UNSUPPORTED list?): io/tst-lchmod. > I'll need to find logs where it did not fail, so far I've only been looking at the machine where I'm experimenting. > I also have a lot of failures in gcc tests: > 6 in libstdc++ (the usual locale/time_get/get_time failures > 7 in gcc (gcc.dg/asan/pr80166.c in various conditions) > 17 in g++ (all in g++.dg/coroutines/torture) > Ooh. I'll need to look at past (gcc-10.1) failures to see if those match any of my past results. > Also, as reported in ticket #4700, all pipeline tests fail with the new > check version. I've proposed a sed, which I hope can be further > simplified... > > All in all, the build went ok. And the system boots (in a VM) without > difficulty. > > Pierre > I'll try and follow-up in the next day or two. ĸen -- Juliet's version of cleanliness was next to godliness, which was to say it was erratic, past all understanding and was seldom seen. -- Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page