On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 21:16 -0700, Matt Bartley wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Matt Bartley wrote:
> > > I've copied the binary from Debian, which isn't statically linked, but
> > > it works anyway.
>
> > Please install a statically linked version inside chroot. If it's a
> > dynamically linked binary it'll have to use your LFS' Glibc libraries.
> > If there is an issue with your Glibc installation, which looks like it
> > might be the case, strace may not function right.
>
> I just tried it with a static linked version of strace and got the same
> result.
>
> # ./strace ./a.out
> strace: exec: No such file or directory
> execve("./a.out", ["./a.out"], [/* 8 vars */]) = 0
>
> > couldn't answer it. If there is a known issue with how GCC4 compiles
> > Glibc (or how the current instructions in LFS might be buggy for this
> > application and miscompile Glibc) you should be able to find it in the
> > mailinglist archives.
>
> I've monitored the mailing lists and have seen nothing else about this.
> There was a recent report that the gcc4 branch was buildable up to kbd,
> much further than I got, and a patch was posted to get past kbd.
hm ... just a wild guess ... can you run other programs in that
filesystem...
may be it is mounted with noexec ...
--
H
CUH Rainer Peter Feller
H
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
