On 3/23/06, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps the gcc problem I had is not common, maybe it was my error, but > would it be a good idea to include in future books a gcc link test in > chapter five, or at the beginning of chapter six. It certainly would > have helped me, and saved your time, if I had known to run that quick > test on /tools/bin/gcc. > > Thanks again for all your help.
Not a problem. The funny thing is that I've seen a lot of people post the "/tools/bin/cc doesn't exist" problem, and it never occurred to me what the issue was. Yesterday was the first time that I thought that maybe gcc itself was the problem and not some other toolchain issue. I'm not sure how it would go into the book, but maybe a sanity check at the end of gcc-pass2 (the first package after the toolchain adjustment): readelf -l /tools/bin/cc | grep '/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2' I'll bring something up on lfs-dev. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
