On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:06:55PM +0300, Angel Tsankov wrote: > >>>> > >>>>A couple of seconds after `umount /$LFS` failed I issued the same > >>>>command again and it succeeded.
> Seriously, could any of the previous umount commands not have completed > even though it has finished? I've seen a failure to umount $LFS/dev/shm fairly often: normally, it works the second time - I only knew it had failed because $LFS/dev declined to be unmounted. This is on a modern fast machine. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
