xinglp wrote:
> I patched the jhalfs. Maybe I should patch the lfs book instead.
>
> BTW: Is there any tools for editing the lfs book in a easier way,
> other than vim.
No, that's how we've always done it.
> diff -Naur jhalfs.orig/LFS/master.sh jhalfs/LFS/master.sh
> --- jhalfs.orig/LFS/master.sh
> +++ jhalfs/LFS/master.sh
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
>
> # Grab the name of the target (minus the -pass1 or -pass2 in the
> case of gcc
> # and binutils in chapter 5)
> - name=`echo ${this_script} | sed -e 's...@[0-9]\{3\}-@@' -e
> 's...@-pass[0-9]\{1\}@@'`
> + name=`echo ${this_script} | sed -e 's...@[0-9]\{3\}-@@' -e
> 's...@-pass[0-9]\{1\}@@' -e 's...@-utils@@'`
>
> # Set the dependency for the first target.
> if [ -z $PREV ] ; then PREV=022-settingenvironment ; fi
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
> esac
>
> # Grab the name of the target.
> - name=`echo ${this_script} | sed -e 's...@[0-9]\{3\}-@@' -e 's,'$N',,'`
> + name=`echo ${this_script} | sed -e 's...@[0-9]\{3\}-@@' -e
> 's,'$N',,' -e 's...@-utils@@'`
>
> # Find the version of the command files, if it corresponds with
> the building of
> # a specific package. We need this here to can skip scripts not needed
> for
It appears that 'this_script' is taken from the xml filename. I can
easily change that. The problem is that the home page calls it 'XZ
Utils', but the package is named xz-version.
I went ahead and made the change in rev 9438. It shouldn't make any
changes to rendered book.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
