Tobias Gasser wrote: > last time (3 days ago) i compiled gcc 4.6.2 on this machine (intel > i7-2600 with 8gb ram) the compile run 2 minutes, the tests 16min. > > as far as i can see, i used the 7.0 release almost to the letter... > (i upgraded the kernel and kernel-headers to 3.1.4) > > using this 7.0 system as base, i wanted to restart with current dev. > > compiling gcc 4.6.2 still needs 2 minutes, but the tests run for > incredible 11h37mins. > i had 429 failures in the libmudflab part (cat LOG | grep > libmudflap.c|grep FAIL|wc -l) > > almost all of this failures are followed by > WARNING: program timed out > cat LOG|grep "timed out"|grep WARN|wc -l : 250 > > the statistics say 998 expected passes and 429 unexpected failures (same > number as my grep/wc) what is exactly the same numbers as my last compile.
I'd say that 429 unexpected failures is a problem for either the first or second run. To be honest, I haven't built gcc 4.6.2 yet as I'm concentrating on BLFS right now. In any case, for 4.6.1 mudflap, I have Running target unix FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c output pattern test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c output pattern test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test === libmudflap Summary === # of expected passes 1415 # of unexpected failures 12 The build time, including tests was 79 minutes. Are you using a -j option to make? I don't recommend that for any of the toolchain packages. The 429 unexpected failures needs to be figured out before proceeding. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
