Eleanore Boyd wrote: > On 8/20/2012 9:09 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:56:56PM +0100, Richard Melville wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:04:49AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >>>>> Unfortunately, this was unlogged and scrolled out of my >>>>> term's buffer - it then died with an EPERM trying to create >>>>> test-suite.log.tmp so I've now started it again, after chown me >>>>> ../automake-1.12.3. >>>> So, in effect that is chown -R some-normal-user ../automake-1.12.x >>>> >>>> If you are interested, compare what we do for the coreutils tests. >>>> [ if you aren't, I understand ]
>>>> >>> Thanks for the really detailed replies Ken -- it's much appreciated. >>> >>> I'm building this when I have the spare time; I'll see if I can run the >>> tests tonight and get back to you. >>> >>> Richard >> Thanks, but perhaps not necessary - it seems to be a problem at my >> end (see Bruce's response, and my reply to that). In particular, >> the "run as a regular user" seems NOT to be the key. > If running as a regular user isn't the key, and no one else is getting > anywhere with it, them maybe it's a bug in Perl itself? What if they > need to change how they read timezones, and how they read and make > timestamps? It's the only thing I can think of that might be wrong at > this point. No, it's our installation of timezones. See my post on lfs-dev. I now have no errors in the perl checks. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
