On 11/09/2012 12:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > >>> I guess it really doesn't make a lot of difference to me. I reboot >>> rarely so typing startx isn't an issue. >>> >>> $ uptime >>> 09:35:21 up 128 days, 17:36, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.21, 0.23 >> Well you are indeed behind >> >> baho-utot@crazy-horse ~]$ uptime >> 11:47:13 up 310 days, 4:25, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.12, 0.08 >> >> Do try to keep uptime ;) > You don't understand. I rebuilt my entire system in July. I had to > reboot then. For other systems, we do a bit better: > > 11:01:45 up 1065 days, 21:47 > 10:02:09 up 253 days, 5:13 > 17:02:33 up 289 days, 10:22 > > That last one was an accident. The one before that was hardware. > > reboot system boot 2.6.27.4lfs64 Wed Jan 25 06:43 (289+10:22) > reboot system boot 2.6.27.4lfs64 Thu Jun 18 05:03 (1240+12:01) > reboot system boot 2.6.27.4lfs64 Sun Apr 26 21:43 (1292+19:21) > > It should be 4.2 years. > > -- Bruce > >
I would have had a greater uptime but without electric power for a week some thing had to give. I just could not keep peddling as my age was starting to show. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
