Dr. George E. Moore wrote: > >> Message: 3 >> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:36:34 -0600 >> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] lfs-support Digest, Vol 2764, Issue 1 >> To: LFS Support List <lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org> >> Message-ID: <50e89ce2.1060...@gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Dr. George E. Moore wrote: >> >> Please don't reply to digest email without trimming. >> >>> The output of the "version-check-sh" clearly indicate I have missing and >>> perhaps in appropriate versions. I read this and still failed to run >>> this script before now. My apology for not following directions. I'll >>> make the correction and re-try the GCC-4.7.1 make. >>> >>> The content of the script follows: >>> >>> gem@precision690:~$ ./version-check.sh >>> bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release >>> /bin/sh -> /bin/dash >> >> Needs to be bash >> >>> Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.20.1-system.20100303 >>> ./version-check.sh: line 8: bison: command not found >>> yacc not found >> >> Install bison. yacc should then be set up automatically, but check that. >> >>> bzip2, Version 1.0.5, 10-Dec-2007. >>> Coreutils: 8.5 >>> diff (GNU diffutils) 3.0 >>> find (GNU findutils) 4.4.2 >>> ./version-check.sh: line 17: gawk: command not found >>> /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/mawk >> >> Install gawk and check the symlink >> >>> gcc (Debian 4.4.5-8) 4.4.5 >>> (Debian EGLIBC 2.11.3-4) 2.11.3 >>> GNU grep 2.6.3 >>> gzip 1.3.12 >>> Linux version 2.6.32-5-686 (Debian 2.6.32-46) (da...@debian.org) (gcc >>> version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 09:49:36 UTC 2012 >>> m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.14 >>> GNU Make 3.81 >>> patch 2.6 >>> Perl version='5.10.1'; >>> GNU sed version 4.2.1 >>> tar (GNU tar) 1.23 >>> Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13 >>> xz (XZ Utils) 5.0.0 >>> gcc compilation OK >>> gem@precision690:~$ >> >> The rest is OK. >> >> -- Bruce > > Bruce, > > Thanks for getting back with me. > > I have been able to get the gcc-4.7.1 pass 1 to run to completion; > however, I have some concerns as to its validity, given what I had to > do. Let me explain: > > After linking /bin/sh -> /bin/bash; installing bison and gawk; > validating that /usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/bison.yacc, and > that /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk, I re-configured and ran make again > in the gcc-build directory. The compilation stilled failed while > building gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c; with the same error - > GNU_USER_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS() undefined.
We recommend you remove the source directory, and in this case gcc-build, and start the section fresh. It appears you started from the failed position and that results in an undetermined state. > I rechecked the instructions and the host requirements; however, it > appears that the guidelines are being following. > > I located the macro definition for GNU_USER_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS() in > gcc-4.7.1/gcc/config/gnu.h header and added it to c-cppbuiltins.c. > > The compilation then error when compiling gcc/gcc.c. with > GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKER and GNU_USER_LINKER_EMULATION as undefined. > > I located these #define in gcc-4.7.1/gcc/config/i386/gnu.h and added > this header to gcc.c. This should not be necessary. All the instructions needed are in the book. > My question is whether this pass 1 build is valid? It seems that my > having to add headers to .c file is some what unorthodoxy, and could > result in a bad build. I'm a little reluctant to go forward without some > feedback. I would have assumed that these defines would have been > included in some "common" directory path search or not needed for > compiling gcc-4.7.1 pass 1. See above. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
