Em 15-05-2013 20:06, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Michael E. Maher wrote: > >> The mail from Matias really says it all, it's the extra `(POSIX regular >> expressions)' which is screwing up the integer comparison `if test "..." >> -ge 429; then'. >> >> This seems like a bug in either: >> less -V giving too much information for xz >> - or - >> xzless assuming that less -V is a certain way >> >> For a quick (untested) hack, you could remove the check or change the >> statement to: >> >> if test "$(less -V | { read ver && echo ${ver#less }; } | awk '{print >> $1}')" -ge 429; then > > System 1 > > $ less -V > less 444 > ... > > System 2 > > $ less -V > less 451 (POSIX regular expressions) > > The error is in xz assuming that the version format doesn't change. > > It should be something like: > > if ( test "$(less -V | head -n1 | cut -d' ' -f2)" -ge 429; then > ... > > That's shorter, more robust, and has more clarity. > > -- Bruce >
Thank you, Bruce, I have got an error with your suggestion. A typo, I think. Corrected adding a ")" after "429": if ( test "$(less -V | head -n1 | cut -d' ' -f2)" -ge 429); then -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page