> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:47:42 -0600
> From: Louis Rine <louisr...@gmail.com>
> To: LFS Support List <lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org>
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8 Libstdc++-4.8.1
>
> If this is the correct use of ldd...
>
> :~$ ldd /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-ranlib
>         linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fffa837b000)
>         libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007ff874f03000)
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff874b3a000)
>         /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff87511a000)
>
> Not sure how to tell if that output is correct...


(Not near a machine with /tools -type stuff/logs in it just now.)


>
> I'm using netrunner 13.06 which is based on ubuntu 12 I think?
>


In the host-sys-req output you gave below, the min/max version numbers all 
looked ok, at least outwith the following commented items.


> host system requirements check scripts gives the following
>
> :~$ ~/code/lfs/version-check.sh
> bash, version 4.2.45(1)-release
> /bin/sh -> /bin/dash


At the time of present post, you have now of course, corrected that to be 
really bash and not dash. But see also note below re really starting build 
cleanly from scratch again.


>
> Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.23.2
>
> bison (GNU Bison) 2.5
>
> /usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/bison.yacc


Is '/usr/bin/bison.yacc' just a short shell script? If so, can you post it 
here.


>
        .
        .
>
> gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-1ubuntu1) 4.7.3
>
> g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-1ubuntu1) 4.7.3
>
> (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.17-0ubuntu5.1) 2.17


NB that _says_ 'EGLIBC' and not specifically glibc (tho' dunno what exactly 
is in place). I'd expect there'd be likely some extra issues that you'd have 
to deal with if building on a (genuine) eglibc system and not a (genuine) 
glibc system.


> 
        .
        .
> 
> Which seemed ok, perhaps I missed something there after all?
>


NB that once the host-sys-reqs are gotten to be all-ok, you're probably best 
(for the present issue) to start from scratch: I know you said that you had, 
after having corrected the 'dash' issue - but then in the same breath said 
you'd left stuff in /tools ; be sure to really be starting again from scratch 
- you're building the foundations at this stage, and you want them to be 
'just-so'.



rgds,
akh





--
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to