> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:26:46 -0800
> From: "Waitman Gobble" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [lfs-support] creating binutils-build again
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Version 7.5-rc1
>
> In 5.5. GCC-4.8.2 - Pass 1, the book reads "mkdir -v ../binutils-build",


No it doesn't: it says 'mkdir -v ../gcc-build' ; gcc-pass2 says same.

Binutils-pass1 says 'mkdir -v ../binutils-build' ; binutils-pass2 says same.


> then in 5.9. Binutils-2.24 - Pass 2, the book reads "Create a separate
> build directory again: mkdir -v ../binutils-build".
>
> There is confusion about whether the binutils-build directory created in
> pass 1 should be removed before pass 2, or if it's OK to do pass 2 with
> the existing binutils-build from pass 1.
>
> Thank you,
>


You might get away with it if you have left the respective '../____-build'
directories _completely_ empty between their respective pass1 & pass2.


But to be on safe side - you're building particularly intricate and
interrelated software at especially that stage of the book - , follow
the book:
====
Ref:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/generalinstructions.html#buildinstr

Per that ref, "Unless instructed otherwise": After each package page,
remove the unpacked/untarred source directory (and thus all of its contents
too; and thus also anything that has been generated inside it during the
configure/build/install), and any separate build directory (and thus all
of its contents too).

So for (the spirit of) your particular question: remove those '../____-build'
directories after their pass1, and make fresh dir at each respective pass2.
====


rgds,
akh



>
> -- 
> Waitman Gobble
> San Jose California USA
> +1.510-830-7975
> -- 
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>


--
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to