On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:04:42 +0000
Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:15:35PM -0400, Jonathan Arnold wrote:
> > I'm doing the 5.7 glibc-2.19 step and everything seems to be going
> > along swimmingly. But the test program mentioned in the Caution
> > isn't exactly what is desired:
> >
> > lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
> > lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ $LFS_TGT-gcc dummy.c
> > lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools'
> > [Requesting program
> > interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
> >
> > While the Caution says to expect the /tools/lib64 part, it doesn't
> > say anything about the '-x86-64' I have appended to the name. Is
> > this going to be okay or is something amiss here?
> >
>
> Your result looks fine. When you get to section 6.10 you will see
> that we add the phrase "allowing for platform-specific differences in
> dynamic linker name". If you look at your host system, the linker
> will be ld-linux-x86-64.so for 64-bit x86_64.
>
> ĸen
Thanks for the input. I figured as much but I didn't want any screwups
so early in the game!
--
Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io
If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you
need a team ~ John Wooden
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
