William Immendorf wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: >> LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook. >> >> I'll see what I can do. > I've looked at the patch briefly. I'm pretty sure that using rm to > remove an executable is a bad idea in a system that might not always > have package management. I'd also note that shadow will likely install > man pages for the executable, and the patch does not have any > instructions to handle that. > > Bruce, my suggestion would be to add a new sed based off the one for > disabling the groups executable. I'd imagine that something like this > would do the trick: > > sed -i 's/nologin$(EXEEXT) //' src/Makefile.in > find man -name Makefile.in -exec sed -i 's/nologin\.8 / /' {} \;
Yes, I was going to do that. Thanks for the instructions tho. Saves me some time. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
