Hi All;
""partition after chrooting to /mnt/sysimage..
It was this way for me while I was using my Stick to set up Fedora,
but after Rebooting, It was then able to be seen as /lfs or I could
mount it on /mnt/lfs..
But my real problem was, that it didn't have Gcc, so after installing
it and everything else..
I saw that gcc was too new, and I couldn't figure out 'How" to install
gcc from the fc21 instead of the fc23.. Yum wouldn't see the other
site and I didn't know how to direct it to the fc21 site..
I finally had to give up again.. I just don't know enough about the
working(s) of lfs and linux to get around to what others would
perceive as simple problems..
So, Thank You to everyone for Your Help..
THANK YOU Marty
Marty,
I think if you have gcc-5.3.x, for any x, this is OK. We should add a
note in the book, because of the new release scheme for GCC:
"Official" releases are labelled x.y.0. It seems that distros can
replace the last 0 (the "patch number") by something else, possibly
numbering their own patches. So the sentence for GCC in "host
requirements" should read:
"Versions greater than 5.3.x for any x (*) are not recommended as they
have not been tested". I know we haven't tested all versions 5.3.x, but
this has always been true. We have never tested all distros patches either.
Pierre
(*) I let true English writers fix this sentence to make it
understandable...
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
