On 19 February 2017 at 22:28, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hazel Russman wrote: >> >> In the sanity tests for glibc, the book says: >> [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] >> Note that /lib is now the prefix of our dynamic linker. >> >> The output is as shown but the explanation is confusing. The linker is >> indeed in /lib but the output actually says >> /lib64, referring to the symbolic link. > > > OK, I'll clarify that. > > -- Bruce
I am currently building an LFS-8.0 (systemd) (having already built LFS-7.10) and have just come to this section. Hasn’t the /lib64 → /lib symlink been removed in this version of the book (i.e. /lib64 is now a full-blown directory in its own right)? Mark -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
