All, I am building 8.1 systemd, and during 5.17 bison-3.0.4 make check, I receive a g++ fatal error:
lfs@testbox:/mnt/lfs/ sources/bison-3.0.4$ make check GEN public-submodule-commit make check-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4' Making check in po make[2]: Entering directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4/po' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4/po' Making check in runtime-po make[2]: Entering directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4/runtime-po' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4/runtime-po' Making check in . make[2]: Entering directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4' GEN doc/bison.help make examples/calc++/calc++ examples/mfcalc/mfcalc examples/rpcalc/rpcalc ./tests/bison tests/atconfig tests/atlocal make[3]: Entering directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4' YACC examples/calc++/calc++-parser.stamp CXX examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-driver.o LEX examples/calc++/calc++-scanner.cc CXX examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-scanner.o *g++: error: ./examples/calc++/calc++-**scanner.cc: No such file or directory** **g++: fatal error: no input files* compilation terminated. Makefile:4081: recipe for target 'examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-scanner.o' failed make[3]: *** [examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-scanner.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4' Makefile:4974: recipe for target 'check-am' failed make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4' Makefile:4522: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4' Makefile:4977: recipe for target 'check' failed make: *** [check] Error 2 lfs@testbox:/mnt/lfs/sources/bison-3.0.4$ As it is stated that test suites are not necessarily required in Ch. 5 (CH. 4.6), I wanted the communities' input as to whether this was a valid concern here or not. check-version.sh returns: bash version-check.sh bash, version 4.4.0(1)-release /bin/sh -> /UNIONFS/bin/bash Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.27 bison (GNU Bison) 3.0.4 /usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/bison.yacc bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010. Coreutils: 8.25 diff (GNU diffutils) 3.5 find (GNU findutils) 4.7.0-git GNU Awk 4.1.3, API: 1.1 (GNU MPFR 3.1.4-p2, GNU MP 6.1.1) /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk gcc (Debian 6.2.0-4) 6.2.0 20160914 g++ (Debian 6.2.0-4) 6.2.0 20160914 (Debian GLIBC 2.24-3) 2.24 grep (GNU grep) 2.25 gzip 1.6 Linux version 4.7.9-64 (root@eeepc) (gcc version 6.2.0 20160914 (Debian 6.2.0-4) ) #19 SMP PREEMPT Sat Oct 22 02:39:01 CEST 2016 m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.17 GNU Make 4.1 GNU patch 2.7.5 Perl version='5.24.1'; sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2 tar (GNU tar) 1.29 texi2any (GNU texinfo) 6.3 xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.0alpha g++ compilation OK Your input is greatly appreciated in advance. Cheers, Brandon
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
