On 2/15/2018 5:51 AM, René Nyffenegger wrote:
As I am proceeding with building LFS, I am now in Step 6.10, Adjusting
the Toolchain.
The book instructs me to
grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g' On my system, the
output is:
SEARCH_DIR("=/tools/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib64")
SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib")
SEARCH_DIR("/lib")
SEARCH_DIR("=/tools/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
Although the book tells me to ignore components with '-linux-gnu', I am
still
a bit worried about the paths that start with /tools. I just want to be
100% positive
about going on with my build process.
So, the question is: can I ignore these -linux-gnu search strings
ALTHOUGH they start with /tools?
This is what my build produces, the Output lines are from the Book and
what you should be looking for. The lines not prefixed by Output: are
the actual lines from the test. I believe you are good to go. The
"real" test comes after gcc. That is the one that gave me the most
grief. Since I am doing scripted builds and I failed to remove the gcc
symlink the install process got all balled up.
Output: [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
Output: /usr/lib/../lib/crt1.o succeeded
Output: /usr/lib/../lib/crti.o succeeded
Output: /usr/lib/../lib/crtn.o succeeded
/usr/lib/../lib/crt1.o succeeded
/usr/lib/../lib/crti.o succeeded
/usr/lib/../lib/crtn.o succeeded
Output: #include <...> search starts here:
Output: /usr/include
#include <...> search starts here:
/usr/include
Output: SEARCH_DIR(/usr/lib)
Output: SEARCH_DIR(/lib)
SEARCH_DIR("=/tools/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib64")
SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib")
SEARCH_DIR("/lib")
SEARCH_DIR("=/tools/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib");
Output: attempt to open /lib/libc.so.6 succeeded
attempt to open /lib/libc.so.6 succeeded
Output: found ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 at /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
found ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 at /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
removed 'dummy.c'
removed 'a.out'
removed 'dummy.log'
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
