Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 14:24 Michele Bucca <michele.bu...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 13:22 Christer Solskogen > <christer.solsko...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > On 27.11.2018 20:02, Michele Bucca wrote: > > > > > > > > > Il 27 nov 2018 12:09 AM, "Paul Rogers" <paulgrog...@fastmail.fm > > > <mailto:paulgrog...@fastmail.fm>> ha scritto: > > > > > > > I'm sorry to bother you with a question like this but I have no > > > other > > > > place to ask, nobody has answered to this. > > > ___8<... > > > > SHOULD be compatible. I'm so tired and in frustration. > > > > > > Michele, I don't have a solution your compilation issue, but I do > > > have a meta-solution. Break away from beating your head against the > > > wall here--it's an impediment to the solution. Do something nice > > > for a while, until you can come back to this with a fresher > > > perspective. It's rarely a waste of time. "Sleep on it" if possible. > > > > > > > > > I've already solved my problem > > > > > > > Would you care to explain how? > > > > I've said it before but I'll write it again so you won't have to look for it: > > My cross-compiler lacked of a complete limits.h header. To generate > it, inside GCC's source directory, I had to run > > cat gcc/limitx.h gcc/glimits.h gcc/limity.h > \ > `dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-fiĆ²e-name)`/include-fixed/limits.h > > where $LFS_TGT is the TARGET of your cross-compiler, eg: arm-linux-gnueabi > > These instructions are also reported on the LFS book [1] > > [1] http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/gcc-pass2.html > >
Whoops! There's a typo in the command, here's the correct one: cat gcc/limitx.h gcc/glimits.h gcc/limity.h > \ `dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/include-fixed/limits.h Cheers - Michele Bucca > > -- > > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > > Do not top post on this list. > > > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > A: Top-posting. > > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style