On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 03:17:02PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > Originally, I used memmove/memchr for speed--they're well-optimized. In > retrospect, that's also iterating over the input buffer twice (though in > a cache-friendly way.) > > Here's one that anyone can understand:
This one is nicer indeed. And smaller. It has a bug but it does not matter. I have just noticed that crlf_to_lf is not needed at all. The data will be converted by other copy peer. Currently they are converted twice. -- Alexander.
