On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 02:24:49PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
> > I don't see where the problem is, this is a pretty standard operation (and a
> > fairly textbook class.) It's the same as BSD timeradd/timersub, just with C++
> > syntax.
> 
> I have applied the patch, although I don't particularly like the Timer class,
> it is not quite obvious.

It was a little more direct, originally, storing the interval with its
constructor; I removed that as the interval can change with each call.
I might put it back and update the interval with Reconfig, which would
make it more straightforward.

-- 
Glenn Maynard

Reply via email to