More of a time target... even if far out.

Matt Wilson <m...@amazon.com> wrote:

>On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:19:16AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 05/10/2013 07:51 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> > I hope it is clear that there is no resistance from me in this
>diet-program.
>> > The issue I face to help you are the same you do: priority - those
>merge windows,
>> > darn bugs, regressions, etc.
>> 
>> Of course.  Ultimately, we don't want to break things.  I would like
>to
>> see the Xen community more committed to a roadmap toward killing PV
>in
>> favor of HVM or what you call hybrid.
>
>I think that there is broad agreement both that we want to move in
>that direction, and also that a migration will take time to realize.
>
>When you say "more committed," are you thinking of a declared
>schedule? Or perhaps more visible progress toward that goal?
>
>--msw

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
_______________________________________________
Lguest mailing list
Lguest@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/lguest

Reply via email to