More of a time target... even if far out. Matt Wilson <m...@amazon.com> wrote:
>On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:19:16AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 05/10/2013 07:51 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> > I hope it is clear that there is no resistance from me in this >diet-program. >> > The issue I face to help you are the same you do: priority - those >merge windows, >> > darn bugs, regressions, etc. >> >> Of course. Ultimately, we don't want to break things. I would like >to >> see the Xen community more committed to a roadmap toward killing PV >in >> favor of HVM or what you call hybrid. > >I think that there is broad agreement both that we want to move in >that direction, and also that a migration will take time to realize. > >When you say "more committed," are you thinking of a declared >schedule? Or perhaps more visible progress toward that goal? > >--msw -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting. _______________________________________________ Lguest mailing list Lguest@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/lguest