On 02/02/2008, at 11:18 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > 2.6.24 should be good, although it's always possible that we > broke things. > For the tutorial I chose to stay with 2.6.23, since 2.6.24 was so > new that it > might not boot on people's laptops...
Thanks Rusty, that reassurance made me dig deeper and find a couple of missing kernel options that were stopping me on 2.6.24. Regards, Mark Wallis [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Lguest mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/lguest
