On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:15 AM, inflo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > i was thinking about more network interfaces inside an guest, i think > there two ways, one to setup the guest at startup with more network, > e.g. --tunnet=192.168.3.1;192.168.4.1 but then a guest must be > restarted if one want more interfaces. So the second one would be a > hypercall to setup a new field in devices.descpage and call the rest > stuff like add_lguest_device().
I don't really understand. This seems incredibly specialized. This is the second idea I've seen that threatens to push us into hypercall cancer. Why not a paravirt device that can add more devices using file i/o commands instead of more hypercalls? or a device that guests use to talk to hosts about their environment in general? ron _______________________________________________ Lguest mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/lguest
