> fps information on a non-constant frame rate stream is a bit misleading...
>
> Yet, you have a time_base in the stream description.

Right :) I guess what I'm trying to say is that I might capture a
frame anywhere in those 40 ms between each frame rather than right on
the 1/25 mark. I don't know if it even matters that much, or if I
should simply consider a frame captured at e.g. 45 ms to be frame 2. I
feel like what I've encoded so far looks a little jerky though, so I'm
wondering if it matters.

> All depends on the container format =)

I'm calling av_guess_format() with ".avi".

/ Soren

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29/12/11 17:22, Soren Dreijer wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the quick replies, Luca!
>>
>>>> So, rather than setting the timebase to 1/<fps>   as e.g.
>>>> output-example.c does, I'd simply set it to 1/1000 if my incoming
>>>> timestamps are in milliseconds? Let's say I capture my first frame a 0
>>>> ms and the second frame a 45 ms. Should I then set the frames' pts to
>>>> 0 and 45, respectively in the AVPacket?
>>>
>>>
>>> should work.
>>
>>
>> Where do I set pts timebase? If I change the AVCodecContext::time_base
>> from 1/25 to 1/1000, the resulting FPS of the video is 1000, which
>> isn't what I want. I still want 25 FPS, but I'd like to have more
>> granularity when specifying each frame's pts.
>
>
> fps information on a non-constant frame rate stream is a bit misleading...
>
> Yet, you have a time_base in the stream description.
>
>
>>> The encoder does not care about pts, the muxer will and depending on it
>>> you
>>> might have to use such tricks.
>>
>>
>> That's where I get confused because I just call
>> av_interleaved_write_frame() with the AVPacket with the correct pts
>> and the muxer is "hidden" from me (as far as I know?). It sounds like
>> I shouldn't rely on the muxer to be clever enough to handle dropped
>> frames then?
>
>
> All depends on the container format =)
>
>
> lu
>
> --
>
> Luca Barbato
> Gentoo/linux
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
>
> _______________________________________________
> libav-api mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-api
_______________________________________________
libav-api mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-api

Reply via email to