2011/4/27 Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com>:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ---
>>  libavcodec/mpegvideo.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c b/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c
>> index c48b30f..48f25b3 100644
>> --- a/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c
>> +++ b/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c
>> @@ -520,6 +520,8 @@ av_cold int MPV_common_init(MpegEncContext *s)
>>      s->flags= s->avctx->flags;
>>      s->flags2= s->avctx->flags2;
>>
>> +    if (s->width && s->height) {
>
> Why?  malloc(0) is fine according to all standards.  Presumably this
> only happens in some degenerate case where performance is irrelevant,
> but testing for it here imposes a (small) penalty on every case.
>

Well the code is hardcoded to fail for for a valid non-error return
value of malloc(0).

We could add the overhead to FF_ALLOCZ_OR_GOTO() if you prefer.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to