On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:24:56PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > I prefer to always s-o-b patches. > > Think of this scenario; a person sends a patch, it is modified by > somebody else, and then applied. Did the original author agree to > those changes? If the s-o-b is there, yes, otherwise not. If you don't > s-o-b all the patches, you wouldn't know.
I don't see how you can determine this from the s-o-b line. It is not a cryptographic signature, it's easily possible to modify the patch and keep the s-o-b line. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
