Hi, On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Kostya <kostya.shish...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:20:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> attached is a RFC for fixing SWS for 9/10bit, as output by H264. It >> >>> takes endianness in account and does some other stuff. As you can see, >> >>> this stuff quickly gets hideous (e.g. planarCopyWrapper is a mess), so >> >>> I'd like some advice on how people think we should do this. >> >>> >> >>> We need this fix so we can convert 10bitBE to 10bitLE and thereby fix >> >>> 10bit H264 on BE systems (e.g. PPC), which are now correct except that >> >>> byte ordering for each word is inverted. >> >> >> >> Attached is one more that should fix fate (at least 10bit h264) on BE >> >> systems, along with the swscale hackery. >> > >> > And one more adding a missing if. We need someone to write tests for >> > these various colorspace conversions... >> >> And this one has fate tests added so that it doesn't break. I've >> tested all YUV8/9/10/16/RGB <-> 10/9bit conversions and they all >> produce images that are visibly correct, so all codepaths should be >> fine. >> >> Ronald > > looks swscaly but probably ok
Yes, I intend to work on making swscale less swscaly. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
