On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:18:08 +0200, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 01:57:00PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > On Sat, 21 May 2011 13:38:44 +0200, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:25:23PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > The encoder has never produced files that could be decoded > > > > with any software and there should be no reason to create > > > > such files anyway. > > > > > > I wonder how hard it would be to fix this thing instead? > > > > > > > I wonder why would you want to support _encoding_ to obscure and evil > > formats. > > I don't think we do any moralizing about the formats we encode to > and we encode to more obscure and more evil formats than this one. > That said, I have no particular attachment to the encoder, I'm > just wondering if fixing it instead is worth the effort. >
If you feel like it, please go ahead. If somebody else wants to do that in the future, he can get the removed stuff from history. I very much doubts anyone cares though. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
