On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > Tested to work as expected on MinGW and Cygwin. > > Good work, please push. This should make us work out-of-the-box > without extra flags on DOS and MinGW :-) >
Sorry for stupid question. MinGW provides _mm_malloc() / _mm_free() functions for alignment allocation. Why them not used in libavutil instead of memalign_hack branch? Them known to be buggy? ----------------------------------------------- Kirill Gavrilov, Software designer. <kir...@sview.ru>
_______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
