On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:10:36PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2011/5/26 Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>:
> >> "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes:
> >>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Kostya <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:18:29AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  libswscale/swscale_template.c |   20 +++-----------------
> >>>>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> looks ok (though LUT may be even better)
> >>>
> >>> The code currently uses av_clip_uint8() everywhere. I'll look into
> >>> converting it to cm[].
> >>
> >> Incidentally, av_clip_uint8 is much faster than a table on ARM...
> >
> > How about av_clip_uint8_fast_init(), which on arm is empty and on x86
> > is const uint8_t *cm = bla + tbl_off;
> 
> Is there any advantage to having a local variable pointing into the clip
> table?  Making it global would avoid the need for an init step.
> 
> > and av_clip_uint8_fast() which on arm is av_clip_uint8() and on x86
> > is cm[]?
> 
> _fast suffixes are stupid.  In this case, what you really mean is
> restricted input range.

And the next thing you'll say is that "Turbo" button on early PCs was stupid 
too.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to