On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Alex Converse <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Alex Converse <[email protected]> > wrote: [...] >> >> Because signed integer representation (two's complement; ones's >> complement; sign magnitude) is implementation defined this also needs >> to to be implementation defined. >> >> See also: >> >> 6.5.4 >>> Some operators (the unary operator ~, and the binary operators <<, >>, &, >>> ^, and |, >>> collectively described as bitwise operators) are required to have operands >>> that have >>> integer type. These operators yield values that depend on the internal >>> representations of >>> integers, and have implementation-defined and undefined aspects for signed >>> types. >> >> Yet we allow all of these >> > > Feel free to propose a better solution. >
ping? _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
